Spot-fixing verdict deferred until February 5
Three Pakistani players will have to wait until February 5 to discover their fate on spot-fixing charges the ICC has placed on them. A six-day hearing in Doha, Qatar failed to come up with a verdict on various corruption charges Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir were facing over incidents in two Tests last summer against England.
The very fact that the Oval Test was also under investigation as well as the Lord's Test provided a late twist to a final day of an ultimately anti-climactic hearing. The players will remain provisionally suspended until they reconvene in Doha to discover their final fate.
Michael Beloff QC, the head of the tribunal and ICC code of conduct commissioner, finally made a statement alongside fellow tribunal members Albie Sachs and Sharad Rao on day of fevered speculation.
"The tribunal has been constituted to hear charges against Butt, Amir and Asif brought under the ICC's anti-corruption code in relation to two Tests played during August 2010 between Pakistan and England, the Oval Test and the Lord's Test," Beloff said.
"Representations have been made to it to reserve any decision on the charges still before it until it has had sufficient time to give the issues careful consideration and until it is able, at the same time as handing down its decision, to provide written reasons. This would not be feasible in the timeframe agreed for this hearing in Doha.
"The tribunal has therefore determined to continue its deliberations and hold a further hearing in Doha on the fifth of February of this year, at which its decisions will be handed down to the parties and any consequential matters will be dealt with. Until that date, all three players will remain suspended from all cricketing activities."
Until today a definitive decision had been expected. In fact, it is believed that the ICC's legal team was keen on having a verdict out today. But the gravity of the possible sanctions, which range from five years to a lifetime ban, the desire of the players' lawyers to defer a verdict and the sheer weight of a six-day, 45-hour proceeding made a quick verdict impossible.
Though the ICC's lawyers expressed "happiness with the way hearings have gone", it is understood that in a bid to press for a verdict they withdrew all charges relating to the Oval Test, bar one against Butt.
The hearings began last Thursday and were held behind the firmest of closed doors. No official statements were made throughout, though it became clear as proceedings continued that differences between the defences of Butt and Asif had emerged, possibly hampering the cases of both.
An apparent contradiction, however, emerged soon after the tribunal's statement. Though Beloff said that "all charges relating to the Lord's Test remain under consideration", Asif's London-based legal firm said that on one charge relating to that match, he had been acquitted.
Asif is "delighted to have been acquitted of the charges brought against him under article 2.4.1 in relation to the Lord's Test Match, also played in August 2010," the statement read. "Mohammad Asif has co-operated fully with the ICC investigations, and is now looking forward to a timely and satisfactory outcome in relation to the outstanding matters brought against him under the ICC's Anti-Corruption Code for Players and Players Support Personnel."
The particular charge states that the code "prohibits providing or receiving any gift, payment or other benefit (whether of a monetary value or otherwise) in circumstances that the player or player support personnel might reasonably have expected could bring him/her or the sport of cricket into disrepute."
The charge appears a minor one compared to the other charges Asif is facing, carrying a punishment of a six-month ban. But the acquittal is thought to stem from the fact that no money was found in Asif's hotel room in London during police investigations.
No comments:
Post a Comment