v 'Result pitches' in Shield cricket worry Sutherland

v

'Result pitches' in Shield cricket worry Sutherland

Daniel Brettig

March 24, 2011

players are not being adequately prepared for international cricket, due to a growing tendency towards "result pitches" that are favourable to bowlers.

In the lead-up to this season's Shield final, won by Tasmania in Hobart, winning captain George Bailey spoke frankly about widespread instances of pitch doctoring in the competition and how it had impacted on the readiness of batsmen and bowlers for Test cricket. The results were painfully clear during a dire home Ashes series, prompting an independent review into the performance of the national team.

"There's no repercussions if a game lasts two or three days, so I think teams request for a result pitch, and the surfaces are playing accordingly, rightly or wrongly," Bailey told AAP. "This probably means our first-class bowlers aren't learning to bowl teams out consistently on flat, batsman-friendly pitches, which we probably saw a little bit during the Ashes.

"The flip side of that is the batsmen aren't having the opportunities to build big innings and get themselves going and score really big hundreds."

Sutherland said he too was worried about the prevailing conditions providing "a false sense of security" for bowlers in particular. "I think we need to be very careful that we don't err on the side of having pitches that are, I guess, prepared to deliver a result," Sutherland told the Cricket Australia website. "The primary purpose of Sheffield Shield cricket is to develop cricketers for the international level, for Test cricket, so one of my concerns there is the playing conditions.

"For batsmen they have to work hard and it's difficult, but at the same time it can lull bowlers into a false sense of security as to actually how good things are. If you go and have a look at Test pitches around the world, they are very, very hard, very, very dry and they have very little grass on them.

"That's one of the things Australian bowlers have to prepare themselves for, when playing at that level. You need to understand exactly what you're up against and the best place to do that is in our surrounds."

Bailey's claims will be investigated by the board's playing conditions committee, which includes former players Mark Taylor, Matthew Hayden, Greg Chappell, Shane Warne, players union boss Paul Marsh and board chairman Jack Clarke.

Another contentious matter is the machinations surrounding the launch of the expanded domestic Twenty20 competition for next summer. Numerous state associations have expressed dissatisfaction with the slovenly nature of negotiations, leaving them very little time to assemble their teams.

However Sutherland argued careful decisions were more prudent, given their lasting effect on the game in this country. "I think there are certainly some issues that are still up in the air and need to be resolved sooner rather than later," he said. "But some of these issues are new to us - the question of private investment in teams, for example, is something that's new to Australian cricket - and they're decisions that once made are irreversible.

"So you can understand the importance of the debate and discussion around those topics, and the need for member associations and the board to make sure they're absolutely certain of not only the right decision, but also the right approach to roll out."

Odds on batsmen to deliver in familiar conditions

Sidharth Monga

	Sanjay Manjrekar: 'India's attitude is their major strength'
Related Links Audio/Video: 'India's attitude is their major strength' Series/Tournaments: ICC Cricket World Cup Teams: India

A home World Cup always comes with unreal expectations from an Indian side. Twice they have lost in home semi-finals. The crowd reaction to the second of those leaves no doubt as to what a home World Cup means to India. The Indian crowds just don't contemplate anything less than the title win.

While they can try and not let such unreasonable expectations affect their mindset, it will still be difficult to not be the centre of attention in the lead-up to the World Cup. Hosts, No. 1 Test side, financial powerhouse of cricket, coming off a disastrous campaign four years ago. Then there is a small matter of Sachin Tendulkar, who has spent 21 years in international cricket carrying such unreal expectations. He has spoken of how desperate he is to have that World Cup in his glorious trophy cabinet, and this could well be his last shot at it, in front of the home crowd in Mumbai if his side makes it to the final.

India the country doesn't expect anything less. How unreal is it to expect that of their side? Not too unreal, really. They will be one of the expected semi-finalists, and it is highly unlikely they won't make it to the top four in their group of seven. From there on, it is a matter of three good days, and they have enough big players in their side to make that happen. The allrounder, though, will be missing, as will be pyrotechnics in the field. If they do succeed, the success will be based on the confidence in their batting unit to score one more than they concede in the field. With that batting line-up, on subcontinent tracks, odds are about even that they can do it three nights in a row.

World Cup pedigree

Until June 25, 1983, India were nobodies in limited-overs cricket. Since that day, when Kapil Dev's men fashioned India's most famous success till date, they have entered every World Cup with high expectations, and have come close thrice: losing the 2003 final, and two semi-finals at home, in 1987 and 1996. The alternate editions, 1992, 1999, and 2007 have been strictly forgettable. Law of averages would suggest another good campaign in 2011.

Form guide

Leading up to the World Cup, India have played two bilateral series in India, and one in South Africa, looking to forget the dismal showing on the seaming tracks in the tri-series in Dambulla. The three-match series against Australia hardly took off, thanks to rain, but India won the only match possible. New Zealand they whitewashed, and that result was achieved by a squad minus the big stars that are expected to play in the World Cup. The main players had travelled early to South Africa, to make up for a cramped schedule. In South Africa, again an injury-hit side competed well, but was unable to capitalize on the 2-1 lead (that, by the way, is one win fewer than they had managed against South Africa in South Africa until then).

Expert eye

Sanjay Manjrekar: The conditions in the subcontinent, India in particular, are going to be totally in favour of batsmen, so teams with strong batting line-ups will have a natural advantage. Fielding, running between the wickets and great bowling attacks will matter, but not as much as depth in batting - which India have. If India's bowlers bowl even reasonably, Indian batsmen will win matches. Watch out for Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag, Yuvraj Singh, Suresh Raina and MS Dhoni.

Where they're likely to finish

Three knockout matches make this an unpredictable World Cup, but India look good to make it to the semi-finals at least.

Watchability

The star-studded batting line-up. Picture this: Tendulkar and Sehwag opening the innings, followed by Gautam Gambhir, Dhoni, Yuvraj, Raina and Yusuf Pathan. A line-up that might leave out the No. 2 batsman in ICC rankings, Virat Kohli. The bowlers are well and truly dark horses, and the fielders steady at best.

Key players
In 2010 Sachin Tendulkar batted as well as he ever has, his batting at a level higher than we would have imagined even of him. He is now adept at scoring fast without taking risks, something India will rely on, not least in the big matches.

Suresh Raina goes into this World Cup with Yuvraj-like expectations of him. The tracks will be to his liking. He has spent a year or so in the finisher role; and his natural shots go to unusual areas, which unsettles opposition plans. Just as importantly, he will be the big athletic presence in the field. Personally too, this will be a crucial tournament for Raina after his failures in South Africa.

Zaheer Khan will have the most painful memories of the heartbreak in 2003. Having put Australia in, his first over, nervous, wayward, set the tone for a one-sided defeat. Eight years later, he is a completely different bowler, one of the sharpest bowling brains in the world, and a nemesis for the same Australian side. He will want to be fit, he will want to be strong, he will want to carry India's weaker suit. As with Tendulkar, this might be his last chance too.

Netherlands

Netherlands
Netherlands cricket is in a period of transition and by the admission of chief executive Richard Cox, there is not any strength in depth among those likely to form the nucleus of the side in the immediate future. However, the impressive Ryan ten Doeschate was named ICC Associate Player of the Year for the second time in three seasons. The on-field highs came with victory over Bangladesh in an ODI in Scotland, and over Derbyshire in the Clydesdale Bank 40, admittedly the only success in 12 matches, although the experience of taking part in the tournament can only help bring players on. When it mattered, Netherlands failed to compete with other leading Associates, poor returns in the World Cricket League and ICC Intercontinental Cup showed there is a lot of work to be done. Another country that will travel to the World Cup in trepidation.
What 2011 holds A strong batting line-up continues to paper over cracks but it will be another difficult year.